Orion Conclusion

  

The ORION

Or research onto

The Antiquity of the Vedas

Conclusion

 

Tilak summarises the logical conclusions, regarding the antiquity of the Vedic literature and hence the Aryans, arrived at by analysing the history / beginning of traditions and legends. He considers these legends across all of Aryans, Greeks and Iranians. The legends and traditions, of all these were similar and conveyed the same phenomena.

He claims that the best measurement of time for determining periods of antiquity is through reliable records of position of heavenly bodies in those days. Such records, when Hellenic, Iranians and Aryans lived together, were preserved in Rigveda. He states, as per passages in Taittiriya Samhita Brahmana’s there were two traditional year beginnings, which point to the remotest period of antiquity. Such a record is available, in very vague traditions, in Vedas. However the Greeks and Parsis have not preserved these.

Tilak explains that, as per sacrificial literature all sacrifices must commence and end with Aditi (Sun) who is also ruling deity of the nakshatra, Punarvasu. He explains the the nakshatra “Abhijit’ its importance and why it was dropped from the list of 27 Nakshatra.

He derives and suggests the following periods of Vedic literature, based on his analysis, and considers only what has been recorded in Vedic works, including, but not limited to, the astronomical allusions, references, facts and legends

1. Aditi or Pre-Orion Period- 6000-4000 BCE. The Greeks and Parsis have not retained any traditions of this period because they carried with them the calendar of the time when they left /migrated away from Aryans. Therefore you will not find any oldest Greek and Parsi traditions during this  Period.

2. Orion Period-4000-2500 BCE. The Greeks and Parsis leave common home with Aryans and move away.

3. Krittika Period-2500-1400 BCE. It appears that during this period the Chinese came in contact with Indians and borrowed the Nakshatra system

4. Old Sanskrit Literature Period-1400-500 BCE.  Pre -Buddhist period, or till birth and rise of Buddhism.

He comments that, the position of equinoxes which can safely be made the nuclei of different periods of antiquity, based on the Vedic records, as shown earlier. The literary/linguist method can now be used to supplement to determine the duration of each period. See results of comparative Philology / Mythology and notes by Max Muller.

He shows that the rate of precession of equinoxes (50”) was correctly determined by Hindus, by keeping a continuous record of different positions of equinoxes. Prof Whitney claims it was a lucky hit, and doubts the capability of Hindus.

He summarises the traditions recorded in the respective periods. He highlights how the year beginning was changed from time to time, due to receding Vernal equinox and the seasons accordingly. For example, recession of rainy season from Bhadrapada (Aug/ Sept) to Jyeshta (May/ June) months.

His conclusions are consistent with traditions regarding the antiquity of Zoraster and the Vedas

Please refer to the diagram given on top to understand recession of solstice/ equinoxes.

 

Orion Ch 7

 The ORION

Or research onto

The Antiquity of the Vedas

Chapter VII

Ribhus and Vrishakapi

Tilak explores various hymns of Rgved and interprets them to show the amount of astronomical knowledge Vedic people possessed. Names of nakshatras, planets, references to seasons, the intercalary months and other zodiac phenomena have been mentioned in Rgvedas, though not in the form we know them today. Tilak uses a hymn from Rigveda to show that an eclipse of the sun was observed. He shows with the help of the hymn that Vedic priests were tolerably well acquainted with elementary astronomical facts.

He thus claims that the Vedic rishis were not as ignorant of the broad astronomical facts as they are sometimes represented to be. Even, Prof Ludwig goes further and holds that the Rigveda mentions the inclination of ecliptic with the equator.

He explains in detail the verses which led to the legend of the dog that awakened the Ribhus, after 12 days of rest, (intercalary days) at the end of the year. He further states that Ribhus did not merely represent the rays of the sun but also the three seasons connected with them. But who is this dog? He claims that it is nothing but a constellation of Dog Star which is being referred to. The whole story of Ribhus, as recorded in Rigveda e establishes the fact that when this legend was formed the year commenced with the vernal equinox in Canis major/ dog star. If that be so, the winter solstice would fall on the full moon in Phalguna and then Margashiras would lead the list of nakshatra.

Tilak analyses the hymn of Vrishakapi in the 10th mandala of the Rigveda. He says it is difficult to determine the nature of the deity. Various conjectures have been made as to its character, personality, meaning and origin. Prof. Max Muller compares it with Erikapaeos, an Orphic name of Protogonos … of the Greek. Tilak claims that the identification of Vrishakapi with the Sun is accepted by native and European scholars.

Vrishakapi is a Mriga, and his appearance and disappearance mark the cessation and the recommencement of the sacrifices. The Indian tradition identifies him with the Sun in one form or another and comparison with Greek Erikapaeos points to the same conclusion.

He concludes that the hymn gives us not only a description of the constellation of Orion and Canis (verses 4 and 5), but clearly and expressly defines the position of the sun when he passed to the north of the equator in old times (verse 22), and joined with the legend of the Ribhus we have here unmistakeable and reliable internal evidence of the hymns of the Rigveda to ascertain the period when the traditions incorporated in these hymns were first framed and conceived.

 

 

Orion Ch 5

 The Orion

Or research onto

The Antiquity of Vedas

Chapter V

The Antelope’s Head

In the chapter the Antelope’s head , Tilak mentions that observing  zodiac, containing the nakshatras , planets and the milky way ,is the most attractive and interesting phenomena,(which still it is) which must have stirred the imagination of ancient poets/priests. The numerous legends, which exist in the entire Aryan race, is a proof stating that the ancient race did observe the heavens.

 He tries to decipher some of these legends which relate to this part of zodiac as a correct way to interpret the passages from the Brahmanas.

He starts with the Mrigashiras /Agrahayani nakshatra, which means “an antelope’s head”, suggests the figure of the asterism. He reasons out and establishes identification of Mrigashiras with the constellation of Orion. He confirms the theory of Plutach on the non-Egyptian origin of Orion (Greeks had given their own name to this constellation), Canis and Ursa constellations and safely concludes that they are of Aryan origin. He mentions that there are many passages in Rgved which presuppose the knowledge of stars and constellations. In short Margashiras is Orion constellation.

He explains the methods of interpreting the mythological legends related to the observation of stars/nakshatras/constellations (in particular the Orion). He explains how legends were built on Heaven and Hell, Devayana , Pitriyana. Gates of heaven,(line joining equinoxes) Dogs at these gates, Yama’s dogs and Kerberos guarding Chinvat Bridge( Parsi Legend), Prajapati and Rudra, Apollo (Greeks)  and various other stories relating to movement of soul to heaven/ hell. He compares and identifies the similarities of these legends and way of life as on today.

Souls of the deceased crossing river/stream/water body through the gates, which are guarded by dogs/other animals, is the gist of all the legends and beliefs. They all are denoting that Vernal equinox was in Orion and that, the Milky Way (Path of spirits, Road of the Souls celestial river) could be seen nearby at that time.

All the traditions and legends were generated out of this yearly phenomenon. The legends describing this event are those of, Vishnu and Rudra, Greek legend, Kerberos (Sharvara) and Orthros (Vritra). The legend of Namuchi alias Vritra, his decapitation, Indra , at the gates of heaven, where Orthros is stationed, is represented by the Antelopes head in the heavens , as the head of Orion. There is a strong resemblance of Indra’s foamy weapon with the stream of Milky Way in the heavens. As per Khurshed Yasht , this constellation is the weapon (Vazira) which is constantly aimed by Mithra at the head of Daevas.

 

Observing the coincidence between Aryan and Non Aryan legends, Tilak places a high probability that the figures of the constellations were conceived by Aryans. As also the chief characteristics of Aryan legends is to connect the idea of time.eg, the year and the seasons with beliefs. However no such thing is found in Non-Aryan legends.

He analyses various legends and concludes that the later Vedic traditions and those of Parsis, Greeks and others commenced their year, when Vernal equinox was in Orion.

Heliacal (yearly rising of a star in the East) rising of the constellation, Orion, at the beginning of the year marked the revival of the nature at the commencement of spring. Acronyal(rising of star in the East at Sunset), rising of Orion during autumnal equinox, marked the end of “Varsha season”.

In short this constellation became the harbinger of mild and terrible aspects of the Nature.

He claims, as proposed earlier that, Vernal equinox was in the constellation of
Orion and identifying Namuchi alias Vritra with the constellation of Mrigashiras or the Antelope’s head , situated just below the Milky Way.

The Hindu deity ‘Dattaraya’ with three heads a cow and two dogs, is the representation of the Orion, Canis major, canis minor, Mrigashiras constellations.

 

 

 

Orion Ch 6

  

The ORION

Or research onto

The Antiquity of the Vedas

Chapter VI

Orion and his Belt

 

In this chapter, Tilak analyses other legends, which show that the constellation of Orion was known and figured before the Greeks, the Parsis. The legends and the traditions , so preserved, including the name of the constellation point to the fact that Vernal equinox was then near Margashiras (Orion).

He carries out the etymological analysis of the word ‘Agrayana” and gives out various meanings and possible forms it could have been used for. He claims that it has been used to denote division of time. He infers form this reasoning that ‘Agrahayani’ was used to denote Orion (Margashirsh).

He discusses the Agrayana-ishtis (two half yearly sacrifices) sacrifices, which were performed every half year in Vasant and Sharad seasons. He says that every Ayana must have begun with some nakshatra, though there is no specific mention of this in Vedas, but other texts do corroborate this fact.

He explains Greek legends of Orion and their similarity with Vedic traditions. Like “Death of Orion, by arrow or bitten by a scorpion (the story primarily represents that with scorpion rises in East when Orion sets in West).

Some German traditions and festivities relate better and are more specific with Vedic traditions. In heathenish times, the supreme god of German nations, a wild hunter, who appears under the name of Woden or Goden. This God coincides, both in character and shape with the ancient Rudras of the Vedas.

This ancient God is said to hunt a stag and shoot at it, similar to Rudra shooting at Rishya and Rohit. The shot at that stag is to be compared with Rudra shooting Rishya=Prajapati. Close of the old year and the beginning of the new one, known as ‘Diezwolften’or the 12 days, the dwadashaha of the Indians. This time also coincides with the hottest seasons and so called the Dog Days! German traditions are the reminiscences of a time when the vernal equinox was in Orion, the hunter.

In Greek mythology Orion after his death, was placed among stars, where he appears as a giant with a girdle sword, a lion’s skin and a club.

The 26^th verse in Haoma Yasht, used as a prayer now, is the description of the belt of Orion.

Frd te Mazddo "barat paurvanim aivyaonghanem steher-paesanghem mainyu-tdstem vanghuhim-daendm Mdzdayasnim.

In Vedic works, a similar verse describes the Orion and his belt. The sacred thread may be derived from these verses on belt of Orion.

 The sacred thread of Parsis and the Brahmans seems to be symbolical representation of Prajapati’s girdle or Orion’s belt in all respects. Tilak explores the reasons for this ceremony and the dress code associated with it. The use of mekhala ajina and danda in the upayan ceremony, is probably the imitation of costume of the Orion or Prajapati , the first of Bhramans. There is also a strong coincidence, of the form of Orion as figured by Greeks to the above description.

 

Orion Ch 3 & 4

 Chapter III and IV

Kritikas

Agrahayana

Tilak in the Kritikas chapter tries to show, if the Vedic priests made any correction to calendars due to precession of equinoxes and corresponding shift in the cycle of seasons. He finds out the astronomical references in other puranic texts like Taittiriya Samhita, brahaman, surya siddhant etc. He reasons out the interpretations drawn by Bentley, Colebrooke,, Weber , Biot, Max Muller and others in placing the position of Vernal equinox in Revati ( Nakshatra).

He considers the most logical method, as considered by Vedic priests, is the method of observation. The position of Sun, Moon is observed wrt landmarks, ie, nakshatra/asterisms and not the zodiac signs. He states that the change in the position of vernal equinox necessitates the corresponding change in the position of winter solstice. To this he gives out the references to later vedic works wherein two possible explanations emerge that kritika nakshatra, either coincided with winter solstice or vernal equinox. He shows that a system existed when the year commenced in the winter solstice in the month of Magha and vernal equinox in the last quarter of Bharni/ beginning of Kritika.

He describes how the narration, in puranic texts, on the topic of nakshatra of Gods and those of Yama nomenclature automatically fixes the position of kritika at the beginning of devayana/vernal equinox at the time when the vedic works were compiled. His commentary on these passages gives the direct evidence of the coincidence of the Kritika with the vernal equinox in the days of Taittiriya Samhita.

He criticises Bentley’s views and arguments and places the antiquity of Taittiriya Samhita as 2350 BC. In doing so he says, Quote “I cannot also understand why scholars should hesitate to assign the Vedic works to the same period of antiquity which they allow to the Chinese and the Egyptians. “Unquote.

In the chapter Agrahayana, he gives out the arguments of scholars and their interpretation of the texts, regarding, what could be the beginning of the year, In particular those of Sayana( 14^th century) who based his arguments on the two-fold character of the seasons. He shows what should be the correct interpretation of the texts and discusses how etymological speculation coupled with lexicographer’s explanation of critical words leads to incorrect conclusions. Even some of native astronomers also misinterpreted the texts.

Tilak explains why Margashirsha could not have been the first month of the solstical year. He explains that by placing the year in Agrahayana/Margashirsha the other cardinal points in the zodiac (Two equinoxes and two solstices) must also correspond to the position of nakshatra mentioned in the texts. Thus, leading to, the theory of liberation of equinoxes. He claims by ordinary process of reductio ad absurdum one is compelled to discard the theory that full moon in Margashirsha once began the year at winter solstice.

He compares the Parsi calendar, Avesta, with ancient Hindu calendar and shows how some feasts related to pitri paksha and Fravashinam /month of manes in Avesta start at the same time. He concludes that if properly understood Margashirsha was the first in the cycle of nakshatra and showing that vernal equinox was near it.

 

Orion Chapter 1 & 2

  

The ORION

Or research onto

The Antiquity of the Vedas

Chapters I and II

Introduction

Sacrifices alias the year

The author introduces the subject and highlights the need to ascertain the age of the Vedas. European oriental scholars, in their treatises on the subject, have used their methods and their interpretation of texts to determine the age/ antiquity of the Vedas.

Tilak highlights the defects in adopting the Literary/ Linguist methods used by Max Muller, Dr Haug and Professor Wilson. These scholars have divided the Vedic literature into 4 periods, namely Chhandas, Mantra, Brahmana and Sutras. These scholars assign a duration of 100/200/500/1000 years to each period, thus arriving at an estimated antiquity ranging from 1200 to 2400 BCE. Other European orientalists have placed the age around 2000 BCE based on their interpretation of Aitreya Brahman, Vedang Jyotish, Vedic and other Puranic texts.

 Mr Dhruva, who also submitted a similar essay to the 9th  oriental congress, in 1892, mentions the Vedic periods should be placed according to the Geological strata/periods.

Tilak explains the confusion caused by the absence of any definite statement on any astronomical event. However, there are some stray references to astronomical facts in Vedic literature, regarding the character of a year and time cycle. Some later astronomical works, explain the concept of the Year and different dates of commencement of the Year in India. Such confusion forced Oriental scholars to consider astronomical methods inaccurate. Prof Weber, in particular, considers that any research on the age by the astronomical method will not be possible.

However, Mr Tilak assures that ample evidence is available, both direct and indirect, in the earliest Samhita's and that age can be determined with reference to Indian literature on geographical and historical grounds along with astronomical references in them. Several Indian astronomers like KS Godbole, KL Chatre, and SB Dixit, and a few others have succeeded correctly in interpreting the texts. It appears that European scholars did not refer to any texts available in vernacular languages.

He lays the importance of gathering maximum information on stray references in Vedic works, traditions and practices recorded in the old sacrificial literature available in India. He presumes that there must have been a calendar of sorts to regulate and perform sacrifices at appropriate periodic intervals. In doing so the rishis/priests performed the dual role of sacrificers and timekeepers. The sacrifices must be performed on a particular day of the year. (In Rome the care of the calendar was considered a religious function, and it had been from earliest times placed in the hands of pontiffs).

The yearly sacrifices are the very beginning of the primitive calendar. He gives out that some methods were adopted in old Vedic days to know, what is Savan/civil day, Lunar months and solar year, and a method to intercalate days and months. They could adjust the lunar with the solar year. However, Prof Weber and Dr Schrader were not convinced that the primitive Vedic people/ Aryan civilisation could perform such calculations.

He lays importance on the main point, regarding the commencement of the year. He considers the correlation with yearly sacrifices, seasons, Solstices and Equinoxes. He further explains the significance of Uttarayan, Dakshinayan, Devayana and Pitriyana. He shows how incorrect interpretation of Sanskrit words in Puranic texts leads to incorrect conclusions. He states that when people come across new ideas they try to name them in old words.

He explains as to what should be the correct definition of the day of Devas and how Bhaskaracharya misinterpreted it. He discusses the onset of different seasons with respect to the celestial events, like Solstices and Equinoxes and how they are related to the year. He argues on the point of commencement of the year considered by Vedic people. The two-year beginnings were utilised for different purposes.

 Tilak reasons why there are different year beginnings in other parts of India. Even at present-day places on the Southern side of River Narmada begin their year with Vernal Equinox for civil purposes, but all religious ceremonies are performed in Uttarayana, starting with Winter Solstice.

He concludes that the ancient Aryas commenced their year, which was lunisolar and sidereal, with Vernal Equinox, which later changed to Winter solstice. Both dates were kept one for civil and the other for sacrificial purposes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Brief Summary of the Book

The Orion

Or research onto

The Antiquity of Vedas

Tilak states that the high antiquity of the Egyptian civilization is an accepted fact. However, the scholars hesitated to accept the antiquity of Vedic Civilization earlier than 2400 BCE. He has tried, to show and explain in this book, that the traditions recorded in the Rgved point to a period around 4000 BCE, when the vernal equinox was in Orion (The Dog Star), or when the Dog-star commenced the equinoctial year.

He reasons how legends corroborated in later Sanskrit works are corroborated by the legends of Iran and Greece. He has placed all this evidence, in the form of explanations and interpretations of various texts, quoted by him. He has used the astronomical method for his interpretation of the Sanskrit texts. He has not touched upon the antiquity of the epic texts the Ramayan and Mahabharat, as he found that some accounts in the Puranas are conflicting.

He discusses how time was documented by ancient Aryans in performing various rituals. In doing so the Aryans must have had some sort of method to calculate time. Vedic literature and legends across the Indian continent were also important sources, which he has considered. He shows how all legends, originating from the same astronomical configuration as recorded in Vedic and later Puranic texts existed in Greeks, Parsis, Germans, Egyptians and others in a similar form.

Tilak states that the opinions of the scholars were formed based on the traditions current during their times. This was evident from their treatises and hence the notions of Christian scholars do not place antiquity beyond 4000 BCE. However, some Indian theologists and scholars believe Vedas to have come down from unknown antiquity.

He admits that the astronomical method of determining antiquity is a bit vague because it cannot determine the exact dates of all Vedic hymns or works. However, it is definitely logical and more accurate than the linguist methods. He also states and corrects the misconception that Hindu astronomers could not have borrowed it from Greeks/ Egyptians. The extraordinary history of Indian science is similarly ignored or, as some would argue, deliberately downplayed. The Vedic priests/ Aryas seem to have mastered the art of timekeeping all for their yearly rituals.

He has, therefore confined his work to the interpretation of Vedic texts and related Puranic accounts and astronomical references therein to corroborate his findings, in deciding the antiquity of the Vedas and corresponding evolution of the Aryanic race. He claims that there is no reasonable objection to placing the Vedic literature further back by 1000 years or so around 4000 BCE.

 

 The ORION

Or research onto

The Antiquity of the Vedas

Preface to Summary and Book Review

This book was written by Bal Gangadhar Tilak and published in 1893, is a work of extensive research carried out by him, in giving out his explanation of the antiquity of the Vedas. He was inspired by Lord Krishna’s statement, while reading Bhagwat Gita, which led him to inquire into the ancient Vedic calendar.

He clarifies that this research paper was originally written for the Ninth Oriental Congress held in London in 1892. However the document was too lengthy to be presented and, hence only a summary was inserted in the proceedings. This research paper he later published as a book in 1893.

In the course of his four year research, prior to the publication of this book, he studied and referred the works of numerous scholars, Vedic scriptures, texts, their essays. Tilak in his quest to recognize the Indian Antiquity puts forth his research work way back in 1893 and analysing the very same research scholars who made contributions to the origin of Indian civilization as per their perception and interpretation.

The whole civilizational debate started when west wanted to legitimize their existence. Their perception hovers around Aryan Invasion theory around 2000/1500 BCE and they reconstructed and misinterpreted the archeological evidences and texts. . One must understand that the knowledge flowed down the generations verbally. The written concepts came much later but by then the damage to Indian knowledge was done.

Thus, we are still taught about the Aryan Invasion in 1500BC despite the fact that genetic and archaeological studies find no evidence for any large-scale migration from Central Asia. The date of 1500BC was always arbitrary and we have good reason to believe that climate change caused the decline of Harappan cities five centuries earlier.

The interesting part is that around 65-70 % of these scholars were foreign/Non-Indians. These scholars had studied Indology, Sanskrit, and Indian Literature. (Interestingly they studied these subjects in German, British and other universities). Their views, translation and interpretation of Vedic texts, are, with a backdrop of Western outlook. All these works were available in the late 18^th and beginning of 19^th century. Needless to say, that, their work was considered more authentic as compared to native scholars.

Some of these scholars and their works, Which Mr Tilak, referred to are

1.      Albrocht Weber- “History of Indian Literature”, “Hindu and Chinese systems of Asterisms”

2.      Prof William Dwight Whitney- “Translation and Notes to Surya Sidhanta and Atharv Ved”

3.      Dr Otto Schrader- “Pre historic Antiquities of Aryans People”1890

4.      Kaegi’s Rgved as translated by Aerosmith.

5.      George Cornewall Lewis-“Historical Survey of Astronomy of Ancients”, 1860

6.      Narrien John-“History of origin and progress of Astronomy”, 1833

7.      Henry Thomas Colebrooke- “Essays on Vedas” and translation of other texts. 1805.

8.      Max Muller’s various works. (Do read his details in Wikipedia and anti-Indian stance.

9.      Jean Baptiste François Joseph de Warren-Kalasankalita,1835

10.  Krishna Shastri Godbole, Bhaskaracharya, CR Das, Dr RG Bhandarkar, Dr Dastur Hoshang Jamsap and a few other Indian Scholars.

11.  Bentley-“ Historical view of Hindu Astronomy”

 

 

Tilak does make a case for us to understand the Indian/Aryan Antiquity and correct the misconception of our rich heritage. This treatise shows how Indian culture was incorrectly interpreted by European scholars using our own ancient texts. Mr Tilak uses most of the same references to give his version of interpretation. He gives out his analysis and the logical conclusion.

 

My aim is to generate interest in this subject and motivate you all to read the original text.

 

He has put forward his theory for consideration and further research.

Do read the information on Vedas given in Wikipedia. One can make out the ambiguity and various opinions

Next articles will cover chapter wise summary of the book.